Becoming a RWJF Physician Faculty Scholar
General Information
Timeline
Eligibility Criteria
Selection Criteria
Use of Grant Funds
Evaluation and Monitoring
How to Apply
Application Format
Appendix
General Information
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Physician Faculty Scholars program will make up to 15 three-year awards of up to $300,000 each in 2009 to help outstanding junior faculty in medical schools to develop their careers in academic medicine.
Under the Physician Faculty Scholars program, talented junior faculty, who are nominated by their medical schools and selected by the program, will receive support to enhance their skills and productivity through institutional and national mentoring, specific research experience and protected time in which to acquire it. The program strongly prefers applicants interested in the fields of health policy research, epidemiology, health services research or community-based research. Physician-scientists who conduct basic biomedical research should not apply.
Applicants must be nominated by the dean of a four-year, fully LCME accredited United States medical school (allopathic or osteopathic). Each medical school dean may nominate one junior faculty member in any discipline to begin the program in July 2009. Applicants must be in their first four years of appointment at the time the PFSP award would begin (July 1, 2009) and be at the rank of instructor or assistant professor in a regular line faculty position that could lead to tenure. If a school has an unusual promotion process or if an applicant has a unique situation and does not meet this criterion, the dean’s letter of nomination should explain why this applicant should be considered. In such cases, we recommend that you contact the National Program Office in advance to confirm eligibility. Applications submitted by individuals without nomination by their institution will not be accepted.
Schools may have up to two physicians in the program at any one time, provided they are each in different disciplines.
In selecting scholars for this program, we seek faculty members who have the potential to assume leadership roles in their institutions, their fields of scholarly activity, and their disciplines. The elements that are key to achieving such leadership roles include:
• |
the creativity to engage in new areas of research; |
• |
an appropriate knowledge of the skills and methods to carry out research in the applicant’s chosen field of endeavor; |
• |
a mentor or small cadre of mentors who can advise the applicant in career development and research; and |
• |
the support of the applicant’s institutional leadership, including the dean, chair, and division chief, that enables the candidate to engage in research for at least 50 percent of full-time effort. |
The Foundation will make grants to sponsoring institutions to help cover the scholars’ salary and research costs. Each sponsoring institution must agree to protect 50 percent of the scholar’s time from clinical and teaching responsibilities to spend on the scholarly activities outlined in the scholar’s proposal. Each institution must identify at least one mentor who will advise the scholar on his or her research project, provide career development guidance, and attend one annual national meeting with the scholar.
Additionally, scholars will interact with the medical leaders who serve on the program’s National Advisory Committee (NAC). The program will assign to each scholar a NAC mentor, who will discuss project management and career development with him or her at the program’s annual meeting and throughout the year. NAC mentors may also offer other assistance, such as reviewing and critiquing manuscripts and grant proposals and writing letters of recommendation.
All scholars are expected to attend each annual meeting, where they will present their ongoing research and take part in a broad array of discussions relevant to the program’s focus. They must also attend one additional scientific meeting of their choosing annually.
Timeline
The application process begins approximately 12 months before candidates seek entrance into the program.
The following dates are important in completing your application.
• |
Application forms are due on August 29, 2008 by 5 p.m. PDT. |
• |
Candidates will be notified in December 2008 if they are invited for interviews with the National Advisory Committee.
|
• |
Interviews for selected applications with National Advisory Committee members will take place in March 2009. |
• |
Candidates will be notified of awards by April 2009. |
• |
Appointments begin July 1, 2009. |
Eligibility Criteria
Each candidate must:
• |
be a physician (M.D. or D.O.) who is a citizen or a permanent resident of the United States or its territories; |
• |
be a junior faculty member in any discipline in a regular line position that could lead to tenure. Junior faculty are defined as those who are at the instructor or assistant professor level and have held a faculty position for four years or less at the time the award begins (July 1, 2009); |
• |
be committed to a career in academic medicine; |
• |
provide evidence of research skills (e.g., past research fellowship or equivalent training); |
• |
have published at least two papers in peer-reviewed journals; |
• |
demonstrate excellence as a teacher; and |
• |
care for patients at least one half-day per week. |
As the program is focused on new researchers, a physician is ineligible for the Physician Faculty Scholars program if he or she is currently serving or has previously served as the principal investigator of a grant (whether career development or research) that carries more than 48 months of funding. However, an applicant’s eligibility is not affected if notice of such a funding award is dated after the program’s application deadline (August 29, 2008).
The program strongly prefers applicants interested in the fields of health policy research, epidemiology, health services research or community-based research.
Physician-scientists who do basic biomedical research should not apply. Applicants who are in doubt about whether their research falls within the program's guidelines should contact the National Program Office, at (650) 566-2348 or rwjfpfsp@stanford.edu.
Consistent with all RWJF programs, this program embraces racial, ethnic, gender and disciplinary diversity and encourages candidates with diverse backgrounds to apply.
Selection Criteria
The NAC reviews applications and invites selected applicants to present their research proposals to the committee. The committee uses the following criteria to guide the selection process:
• |
Evidence that the candidate is committed to an academic career and is well prepared to conduct research. |
• |
The research proposal is creative, of high quality and feasible. |
• |
The applicant’s research is in the fields of health policy, epidemiology, health services or community-based research. |
• |
Availability of qualified research mentors and research resources at the candidate's institution. |
• |
Evidence that the candidate is an excellent clinical teacher. |
• |
Evidence that the nominating institution and its senior leadership are committed to supporting the candidate's academic career. |
Use of Grant Funds
Grant funds may be used for a portion of the scholar’s salary, research assistants, community partners, medical student or other trainee summer stipends, project-related domestic travel, and other essential direct project expenses. Grants are made to the sponsoring institutions and follow RWJF’s regular funding guidelines. In keeping with RWJF policy, grant funds may not be used to subsidize individuals for the costs of their health care, to support clinical trials of unapproved drugs or devices, to construct or renovate facilities, for lobbying, or as a substitute for funds currently being used to support similar activities.
Evaluation and Monitoring
Grantee institutions will be expected to meet RWJF requirements for the submission of annual narrative and financial reports, as well as periodic information needed for overall project performance monitoring and management. We expect faculty scholars to participate in all the program’s annual meetings. At the close of the grant, the scholar shall provide a written report of the research project and its findings that can be widely disseminated.
How to Apply
Physicians who meet the eligibility requirements listed above may submit applications for consideration. The Physician Faculty Scholars program accepts paper applications only.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation does not provide critiques of applications submitted.
The application packet consists of:
• |
an original set of application materials with an index and tabbed divider pages (Secure sets with a binder clip. No staples please.) |
• |
10 copies of the entire application including a budget and budget narrative. (Secure sets with a binder clip. No staples please. All copies need an index and tabbed divider pages.)
The original plus ten copies of the application must be received in the National Program Office by 5 p.m. PDT on the August 29, 2008 application deadline. |
Applications should be directed to:
Sally Schroeder
Deputy Director
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Physician Faculty Scholars
30 Alta Road
Stanford, CA 94305
Should you have any questions or need assistance, please contact the National Program Office at (650) 566-2348 or rwjfpfsp@stanford.edu
Application Format
There are 11 sections to the application in addition to the Cover Letter. Please adhere strictly to the following format. Do not exceed the section or page limits.
Provide a table of contents for the sections and divide each section with a labeled tab. The sections of the application should appear in the following order:
1. |
Executive Summary: Use the form provided below. In the sections under “Research Proposal” provide a concise description of the specific aims, significance, and methods (design, outcomes measures and analytic plan) of the project(s) to be conducted if the applicant receives this award. The applicant will have the opportunity to elaborate on the project in Section 8 of the application. |
2. |
Budget and Budget Narrative: See budget guidelines provided below . Owing to the nature of this support, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is requesting that institutions waive indirect costs. |
3. |
Letter of Nomination from the Dean of the Medical School: An acting dean may write this letter. (An associate dean or other school official is not acceptable.) This letter should include: (a) a statement that the applicant is the school’s nominee; (b) the rationale for nomination of this applicant; and (c) a description of the applicant’s contributions to the school, and more specifically, how the proposed project will be viewed during the promotion and tenure discussions at the school. If the applicant’s project requires cooperation from an affiliated organization (e.g. a health care system), the dean’s letter should state that the organization is committed to cooperate. (LIMIT 2 pages; single-spaced) |
4. |
Letters of Support from the Applicant’s Department Chair and Division Head (if applicable): The letters should include statements of commitment to the applicant’s future career. Describe and identify the following: (a) the personal characteristics of the applicant that will enable her/him to serve as a role model for students and residents; (b) the institutional resources available to the candidate during the period of this award; and (c) information on the proposed distribution of the applicant’s time, assuring that at least 50 percent will be devoted to research and scholar pursuits. (LIMIT 2 pages per letter; single-spaced) |
5. |
Description of the Applicant’s Department/Division: The description should include the number of faculty, a list of currently funded research programs, and a bibliography of pertinent research. (LIMIT 2 pages, bibliography can be up to an additional 2 pages if needed; double-spaced) |
6. |
Mentor Letter(s) of Support: The letter(s) should include: (a) background information pertinent to the mentor’s ability to serve as a mentor, including a description of any prior experience as a mentor and prior experience in the applicant’s proposed area of research; (b) a detailed description of how the mentor plans to work with the applicant and collaborate with other mentors, as well as information on the specific areas on which the mentor will provide advice; (c) an assessment of funding and other resources available for support of the applicant’s research; and (d) an indication of the mentor’s willingness to provide an annual update on the applicant’s progress and to attend meetings as appropriate. (If the applicant has more than one mentor, only the primary mentor will need to respond to item d.) Mentors who aren’t at the applicant’s institution should also explain in their letter their specific plan for interacting with the applicant so that they will nonetheless be able to play a vital role in the applicant’s research. (LIMIT 2 pages per letter; single-spaced) |
7. |
Letter of Support from Applicant’s Past Mentor (if applicable): A letter describing the applicant’s ability to carry out the proposed project and their ability to advance the clinical, research, or educational foundation for physicians. (LIMIT 2 pages; single-spaced) |
8. |
Applicant’s Proposal: The total pages cannot exceed 13 pages and must adhere to the page limits for each particular section as listed below. (Double-spaced, using a standard typeface and at least 11 point font. Submissions with smaller font size will not be reviewed. Please number pages.)
The proposed project and necessary resources should be clearly stated and organized as follows: |
a. |
Statement of the research problem and specific aims of the project: Describe the specific research question(s) and hypotheses to be addressed in this project. State how the proposed project addresses important issues and how it will add to the current body of knowledge. (LIMIT 1 page) |
b. |
Background: Provide an overview of the current knowledge on the proposed topic and its importance. (LIMIT ½ page) |
c. |
Previous studies and preparation for conducting research: Describe completed research projects and skills acquired that prepared the applicant for conducting the proposed project. Include names of mentors and program directors from fellowship programs or other experiences. (LIMIT ½ page) |
d. |
Methods: Describe research methodology and proposed analytic techniques. This section is the most important part of the application, and it should contain sufficient detail to demonstrate the feasibility of bringing the research project to a successful conclusion. It should include a subhead on limitations. (LIMIT 9 pages) |
e. |
Applicant’s current educational role: Describe current involvement in education of medical students, residents, and fellows (include supervision of trainees in clinical settings), and give an indication of how this role would change if the applicant is selected as an award recipient. (LIMIT 1 page)
|
f. |
Applicant’s current clinical responsibilities: Describe the time devoted to patient care. Indicate the number and nature of the patients for whom direct care is assumed, and list other clinical attending responsibilities. (LIMIT 1 page) |
9. |
Applicant’s Curriculum Vitae |
10. |
Faculty Mentor(s) Curriculum Vitae: Include only select relevant publications, professional and academic appointments, and current and past research funding support. (LIMIT 4 pages per mentor; CV required for each mentor who is included in Section 6) |
11. |
Reprints: Include articles authored or co-authored by the applicant that have appeared in peer-reviewed journals and represent scholarly productivity. Alternate evidence of scholarship may be submitted if prior approval of the National Program Office is obtained. (LIMIT 4 articles) |
Appendix
If the proposed project requires the cooperation and substantive contributions of another organization, a letter from a representative of that organization indicating its willingness to participate in the project should be included as an appendix.
In addition, a project time line and a list of references used in developing the proposal may be included as appendices.
Appendices that provide more detail on background research, methods, or materials to be used in research are not allowed. Applications with such appendices will not be reviewed.
The information solicited in the application is essential to the selection process. It will be used for screening applicants and as a basis for interviewing.
In required forms, type over lines only; do not change formatting or risk disqualification.
Application Executive Summary [ PDF
179 KB ]
Application Instructions [ PDF
94 KB ]
Sample Cover Letter [ PDF
48 KB ]
Budget Preparation Guidelines [ PDF 105 KB ]

|
Adobe Acrobat Reader is free, and freely distributable,
software that lets you view and print Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) files. |
|